The new rods are 7.75" long, stock is 7.4", so the pin moves up 0.350" in the new piston....that will change the side clearance a LITTLE...5%ish to 60-70 becomes 0.057-0.067ish. ..but yeah, I could print a piston if I take the time to design one.
Attachment:
pin position change.jpg [ 76.24 KiB | Viewed 32524 times ]
On the skirt I figured shorten it to save weight and take some load off the crank. I'm not sure yet what the top of the piston should look like, or the top of the bore (relieved? radius? so I don't yet know where the top ring goes exactly.
I have heads I plan to use....and would prefer not to weld all new combustion chambers into them....I could, you know how I roll, but I'd prefer not to. because this is supposed to be a car build not a lifetime on 1 engine. So that limits how much cutting I can do in the chambers but the general thought I'm having is.
While I was playing with the block I took some rough port measurements and put those numbers in dynamation, then corrected intake manifold and headers to match and the wave simulation is not looking pretty correct. I was using a simpler model that less less info to ballpark, the wave model gives a lot more info though. This is the sheider 254 mechanical cam (light green/red) compared to their 262H-10 hyrdualic cam (dark green/dard red)....about 15hp gain for the mechanical (only 8 in the basic model).
In in the 2nd graph you can see the intake and exhaust wave tuning...the exhaust is tuned to pull about 5pis vacuum during valve cross-over to get the intake charge moving and scavenge the chamber, then the intake is making about 3 psi as the intake valve closes...that is how "tuned" intake and headers add hp. If I change the runer lengths those pulses change..they shift rpm and the number of reflections will change with bigger length changes. The headers are pretty standard 3rd reflection (3 pusles on the graph...shorties you'd expect 4, long tube headers 2 but 3 is usually optimal for hp. In the intake its a vert short runner at 6.5" valve to trumpet....you see the wave completely disappears there are so many reflections. Normally intake want to also be 3 reflection but the port is much too small and the software is saying the flow restriction of a well tuned runner is higher than the gain the tuning delivers so a very short runner the allow recapture of the flow momentum is about the best I can do....so you only see 2-3 psi where something like the frankenferrari the pulse is 10-12 psi....there will be alot of focus on what can be done to improve the intake port.
The 3rd graph is intake and exhaust velocities ...about 0.5 mach for both which is lower side of right for exhaust but a little high for intake perhaps. But remember I just pulled in flathead ford flow numbers I found, the Lincoln will likely be different but this is a start.
Attachment:
scheider 254 v 262H-10.JPG [ 599.11 KiB | Viewed 32524 times ]